研究生考试英语真题，考研英语历年真题
研究生考试英语真题？关于考研英语真题的做法，你可能需要以下步骤：1.先仔细阅读题目和选项；2.快速浏览文章，抓住主要信息；3.有针对性地阅读文章，找出关键信息；4.根据题目要求选择正确答案；5.注意时间控制，不要花太多时间在一个题目上；6.做完后进行答案解析和错误总结，找出自己的薄弱点并加以改进。那么，研究生考试英语真题？一起来了解一下吧。
23年考研英语一真题及答案
《英语能力测试(写作)》是北京外国语大学英语语言文学硕士研究生专业的重要考试科目，英语学院研究生教育包括英语文学、语言学与应用语言学、翻译学、美国研究、英国研究、澳大利亚研究、加拿大研究和爱尔兰研究等方向，重视系统的专业知识传授和严格的研究方法训练。课程设置旨在夯实英语功底，拓展学术视野，培养具有人文素养、独立研究能力和开拓精神的高级外语专门人才。北京外国语大学硕士研究生《英语能力测试(写作)》考试试题如下：
I. Summarize the main points in the following article (in about 200 words) and write a commentary (in about 500 words) on the issue under discussion, relating it to Chinese reality. (70 points)
Gregory Currie, a professor of philosophy at the University of Nottingham, recently argued that we ought not to claim that literature improves us as people, because there is no “compelling evidence that suggests that people are morally or socially better for reading Tolstoy” or other great books.
Actually, there is such evidence. Raymond Mar, a psychologist at York University in Canada, and Keith Oatley, a professor emeritus of cognitive psychology at the University of Toronto, reported in studies published in 2006 and 2009 that individuals who often read fiction appear to be better able to understand other people, empathize with them and view the world from their perspective. This link persisted even after the researchers factored in the possibility that more empathetic individuals might choose to read more novels. A 2010 study by Mar found a similar result in young children: the more stories they had read to them, the keener their “theory of mind,” or mental model of other people’s intentions.
“Deep reading”—as opposed to the often superficial reading we do on the Web—is an endangered practice, one we ought to take steps to preserve as we would a historic building or a significant work of art. Its disappearance would imperil the intellectual and emotional development of generations growing up online, as well as the perpetuation of a critical part of our culture: the novels, poems and other kinds of literature that can be appreciated only by readers whose brains, quite literally, have been trained to apprehend them.
Recent research in cognitive science, psychology and neuroscience has demonstrated that deep reading—slow, immersive, rich in sensory detail and emotional and moral complexity—is a distinctive experience, different in kind from the mere decoding of words. Although deep reading does not, strictly speaking, require a conventional book, the built-in limits of the printed page are uniquely conducive to the deep reading experience. A book’s lack of hyperlinks, for example, frees the reader from making decisions—Should I click on this link or not?—allowing him to remain fully immersed in the narrative.
That immersion is supported by the way the brain handles language rich in detail, allusion and metaphor: by creating a mental representation that draws on the same brain regions that would be active if the scene were unfolding in real life. The emotional situations and moral dilemmas that are the stuff of literature are also vigorous exercise for the brain, propelling us inside the heads of fictional characters and even, studies suggest, increasing our real-life capacity for empathy.
None of this is likely to happen when we’re reading online. Although we call the activity by the same name, the deep reading of books and the information-driven reading we do on the Web are very different, both in the experience they produce and in the capacities they develop. A growing body of evidence suggests that online reading may be less engaging and less satisfying, even for the “digital natives” for whom it is so familiar. For example, Britain’s National Literacy Trust earlier released the results of a study of 34,910 young people aged 8 to 16. Researchers reported that 39% of children and teens read daily using electronic devices, but only 28% read printed materials every day. Those who read only onscreen were three times less likely to say they enjoy reading very much and a third less likely to have a favorite book. The study also found that young people who read daily only onscreen were nearly two times less likely to be above-average readers than those who read daily in print or both in print and onscreen.
To understand why we should be concerned about how young people read, and not just whether they’re reading at all, it helps to know something about the way the ability to read evolved. “Human beings were never born to read,” notes Maryanne Wolf, director of the Center for Reading and Language Research at Tufts University and author of Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain. Unlike the ability to understand and produce spoken language, which under normal circumstances will unfold according to a program dictated by our genes, the ability to read must be painstakingly acquired by each individual.
The deep reader, protected from distractions and attuned to the nuances of language, enters a state that psychologist Victor Nell, in a study of the psychology of pleasure reading, likens to a hypnotic trance. Nell found that when readers are enjoying the experience the most, the pace of their reading actually slows. The combination of fast, fluent decoding of words and slow, unhurried progress on the page gives deep readers time to enrich their reading with reflection, analysis, and their own memories and opinions. It gives them time to establish an intimate relationship with the author, the two of them engaged in an extended and ardent conversation like people falling in love.
This is not reading as many young people are coming to know it. Their reading is pragmatic and instrumental: the difference between what literary critic Frank Kermode calls “carnal reading” and “spiritual reading.” If we allow our offspring to believe carnal reading is all there is—if we don’t open the door to spiritual reading, through an early insistence on discipline and practice—we will have cheated them of an enjoyable, even ecstatic experience they would not otherwise encounter. And we will have deprived them of an elevating and enlightening experience that will enlarge them as people. Observing young people’s attachment to digital devices, some progressive educators and permissive parents talk about needing to “meet kids where they are,” molding instruction around their onscreen habits. This is mistaken. We need, rather, to show them someplace they’ve never been, a place only deep reading can take them.
II. Write an essay (in about 600 words) on the topic below. Your essay should be clear in structure, logical in reasoning and accurate and appropriate in language. (80 points)
Topic
Literature is a nation’s unique cultural heritage and a passage to understanding the soul of the nation. In your opinion, in what ways are Chinese writers important in cross cultural dialogue between China and the West and what role can they play in this endeavour?
考研政策不清晰？同等学力在职申硕有困惑？院校专业不好选？点击底部官网，有专业老师为你答疑解惑，211/985名校研究生硕士/博士开放网申报名中：https://www.87dh.com/yjs2/
2022考研英语真题解析
考灶悔试英隐逗正语历年真题答案
链接: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1jU22iN4XmAum2ZE-0zF9qA
英二真题电子版2022
关于考研英语真题的做法，你可能需要以下步骤：1.先仔细阅读题目和选项；2.快速浏览文章，抓住主要信息；3.有针对性地阅读文章，找出关键信息；4.根据题目要求选择正确答案；5.注意时间控制，不要花太多时间在一个题目上；6.做完后进行答案解析和错误总结，找出自己的薄弱点并加以改进。这样做真题可以提高对考试形式和题型的熟悉度，锻炼阅读理解和解题能力。
为大家整理了一份考研学习资料，包括公共课，数学，英语以及各大专业课的学习资源，后面会不断汇聚更多优秀学习资源，供大家交流分享学习，需要的可以先收藏转存，有时间慢慢看~
考研资料包实时更新
通过百度网盘分享的文件：考研资料实时更新
链接：https://pan.baidu.com/s/14pL6TqlxX7ET6zcP8Cflrw
提取码：1234
研究生英语真题电子版
Part B
慧者大前竖Directions:
嫌皮The following paragraph are given in a wrong order. For Questions 41-45, you are required to reorganize these paragraphs into a coherent text by choosing from the list A-G to filling them into the numbered boxes. Paragraphs E and G have been correctly placed. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)
[A] No disciplines have seized on professionalism with as much enthusiasm as the humanities. You can, Mr Menand points out, became a lawyer in three years and a medical doctor in four. But the regular time it takes to get a doctoral degree in the humanities is nine years. Not surprisingly, up to half of all doctoral students in English drop out before getting their degrees.
[B] His concern is mainly with the humanities: Literature, languages, philosophy and so on. These are disciplines that are going out of style: 22% of American college graduates now major in business compared with only 2% in history and 4% in English. However, many leading American universities want their undergraduates to have a grounding in the basic canon of ideas that every educated person should posses. But most find it difficult to agree on what a “general education” should look like. At Harvard, Mr Menand notes, “the great books are read because they have been read”-they form a sort of social glue.
[C] Equally unsurprisingly, only about half end up with professorships for which they entered graduate school. There are simply too few posts. This is partly because universities continue to produce ever more PhDs. But fewer students want to study humanities subjects: English departments awarded more bachelor’s degrees in 1970-71 than they did 20 years later. Fewer students requires fewer teachers. So, at the end of a decade of theses-writing, many humanities students leave the profession to do something for which they have not been trained.
[D] One reason why it is hard to design and teach such courses is that they can cut across the insistence by top American universities that liberal-arts educations and professional education should be kept separate, taught in different schools. Many students experience both varieties. Although more than half of Harvard undergraduates end up in law, medicine or business, future doctors and lawyers must study a non-specialist liberal-arts degree before embarking on a professional qualification.
[E] Besides professionalizing the professions by this separation, top American universities have professionalised the professor. The growth in public money for academic research has speeded the process: federal research grants rose fourfold between 1960and 1990, but faculty teaching hours fell by half as research took its toll. Professionalism has turned the acquisition of a doctoral degree into a prerequisite for a successful academic career: as late as 1969a third of American professors did not possess one. But the key idea behind professionalisation, argues Mr Menand, is that “the knowledge and skills needed for a particular specialization are transmissible but not transferable.”So disciplines acquire a monopoly not just over the production of knowledge, but also over the production of the producers of knowledge.
[F] The key to reforming higher education, concludes Mr Menand, is to alter the way in which “the producers of knowledge are produced.”Otherwise, academics will continue to think dangerously alike, increasingly detached from the societies which they study, investigate and criticize.”Academic inquiry, at least in some fields, may need to become less exclusionary and more holistic.”Yet quite how that happens, Mr Menand dose not say.
[G] The subtle and intelligent little book The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University should be read by every student thinking of applying to take a doctoral degree. They may then decide to go elsewhere. For something curious has been happening in American Universities, and Louis Menand, a professor of English at Harvard University, captured it skillfully.
G → 41. →42. → E →43. →44. →45.
Part C
Directions:
Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written carefully on ANSWER SHEET 2. (10 points)
With its theme that “Mind is the master weaver,” creating our inner character and outer circumstances, the book As a Man Thinking by James Allen is an in-depth exploration of the central idea of self-help writing.
(46) Allen’s contribution was to take an assumption we all share-that because we are not robots we therefore control our thoughts-and reveal its erroneous nature. Because most of us believe that mind is separate from matter, we think that thoughts can be hidden and made powerless; this allows us to think one way and act another. However, Allen believed that the unconscious mind generates as much action as the conscious mind, and (47) while we may be able to sustain the illusion of control through the conscious mind alone, in reality we are continually faced with a question: “Why cannot I make myself do this or achieve that? ”
Since desire and will are damaged by the presence of thoughts that do not accord with desire, Allen concluded : “ We do not attract what we want, but what we are.” Achievement happens because you as a person embody the external achievement; you don’t “ get” success but become it. There is no gap between mind and matter.
\Part of the fame of Allen’s book is its contention that “Circumstances do not make a person, they reveal him.” (48) This seems a justification for neglect of those in need, and a rationalization of exploitation, of the superiority of those at the top and the inferiority of those at the bottom.
This ,however, would be a knee-jerk reaction to a subtle argument. Each set of circumstances, however bad, offers a unique opportunity for growth. If circumstances always determined the life and prospects of people, then humanity would never have progressed. In fat, (49)circumstances seem to be designed to bring out the best in us and if we feel that we have been “wronged” then we are unlikely to begin a conscious effort to escape from our situation .Nevertheless, as any biographer knows, a person’s early life and its conditions are often the greatest gift to an individual.
The sobering aspect of Allen’s book is that we have no one else to blame for our present condition except ourselves. (50) The upside is the possibilities contained in knowing that everything is up to us; where before we were experts in the array of limitations, now we become authorities of what is possible.
Section Ⅲ Writing
Part A
51. Directions:
Write a letter to a friend of yours to
1) recommend one of your favorite movies and
2) give reasons for your recommendation
Your should write about 100 words on ANSWER SHEET 2
Do not sign your own name at the end of the leter. User “LI MING” instead.
Do not writer the address.(10 points)
Part B
52. Directions:
Write an essay of 160---200 words based on the following drawing. In your essay, you should
1) describe the drawing briefly,
2) explain it’s intended meaning, and
3) give your comments.
Your should write neatly on ANSWER SHEET 2. (20 points)
考研网推荐链接：
2023年研究生考试英语一真题
这里有一份最全的考研英语历年真题资料分享给你
链接:https://pan.baidu.com/s/1XCdjW7zaFdxUgTwqHTmWIQ
通过不断研究和学习历年真题，为考生冲刺阶段复习提分指点迷津，做真题，做历年真题集，对照考纲查缺补漏，提高实战素养，制定做题策略，规划方向；
若资源有问题欢迎追问
以上就是研究生考试英语真题的全部内容，MBA联考英语真题试题及解析 链接：https://pan.baidu.com/s/1gEXa1j6nmXq3q4om0kcjSA 提取码：5uyc 复制这段内容后打开百度网盘手机APP，操作更方便哦！内容来源于互联网，信息真伪需自行辨别。如有侵权请联系删除。
